Sidebar
Latest postings
- Book review of Nature's...
9 hours, 40 minutes ago - God and science
10 hours, 29 minutes ago - Fact or Fiction?
10 hours, 34 minutes ago - Refutation of the...
10 hours, 41 minutes ago - God and science
14 hours, 54 minutes ago - Refutation of the...
1 days, 23 hours, 17 min. ago - Refutation of the...
2 days, 7 hours, 5 min. ago - Important Quantum...
4 days, 1 hours, 46 min. ago - Refutation of the...
4 days, 4 hours, 33 min. ago - Refutation of the...
5 days, 0 hours, 27 min. ago - Refutation of the...
5 days, 1 hours, 51 min. ago - Categories or Degrees of...
5 days, 1 hours, 59 min. ago - Refutation of a...
5 days, 2 hours, 3 min. ago - Refutation of a...
5 days, 2 hours, 9 min. ago - Refutation of a...
5 days, 2 hours, 31 min. ago - Refutation of a...
5 days, 23 hours, 43 min. ago - Refutation of the...
6 days, 0 hours, 26 min. ago - Refutation of the...
6 days, 2 hours, 14 min. ago - Refutation of the...
6 days, 2 hours, 26 min. ago - Refutation of the...
6 days, 9 hours, 17 min. ago - Categories or Degrees of...
6 days, 23 hours, 52 min. ago - Refutation of the...
6 days, 23 hours, 57 min. ago - Cosmology: Latest theories...
7 days, 0 hours, 7 min. ago - Refutation of the...
7 days, 2 hours, 54 min. ago - Politics and science; is...
7 days, 10 hours, 24 min. ago - Politics and science; is...
7 days, 23 hours, 21 min. ago - Refutation of the...
8 days, 2 hours, 11 min. ago - Refutation of the...
8 days, 9 hours, 40 min. ago - Refutation of the...
8 days, 9 hours, 49 min. ago - Refutation of the...
8 days, 20 hours, 39 min. ago - Refutation of the...
9 days, 1 hours, 23 min. ago - Refutation of the...
9 days, 8 hours, 23 min. ago - Refutation of the...
9 days, 8 hours, 59 min. ago - Refutation of the...
10 days, 0 hours, 34 min. ago - Refutation of the...
10 days, 0 hours, 55 min. ago - The limitations of science
10 days, 1 hours, 3 min. ago - The limitations of science
11 days, 7 hours, 3 min. ago - De-Evolution for the...
11 days, 7 hours, 14 min. ago - The limitations of science
12 days, 3 hours, 32 min. ago - Categories or Degrees of...
12 days, 3 hours, 46 min. ago
- Information too large for the message field - Neil, 2009-10-26, 08:16
(0) (General)
- Fact or Fiction? - dhw, 2010-03-12, 14:00
(0) (General)
- God and science - Neil, 2010-03-12, 09:40
(1) (What should be taught in schools?)- God and science - David Turell, 2010-03-12, 14:05
- Important Quantum Computing Verification - xeno6696, 2010-03-08, 22:48
(0) (Humans)
- Cosmology: Latest theories of everything - David Turell, 2010-03-06, 00:27
(0) (Introduction)
- Few days away from the site - xeno6696, 2010-02-26, 00:23
(0) (Introduction)
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - xeno6696, 2010-02-23, 23:01
(6) (The limitations of science)- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - David Turell, 2010-02-23, 23:12
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:26
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - David Turell, 2010-02-24, 01:38
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 15:28
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - George Jelliss, 2010-02-28, 20:34
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - David Turell, 2010-03-01, 17:20
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - George Jelliss, 2010-02-28, 20:34
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 15:28
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - David Turell, 2010-02-24, 01:38
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:26
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - David Turell, 2010-02-23, 23:12
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - xeno6696, 2010-02-23, 22:01
(8) (Origins)- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - David Turell, 2010-02-23, 23:03
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:26
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - David Turell, 2010-02-24, 01:36
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 15:06
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - David Turell, 2010-02-24, 01:36
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - David Turell, 2010-03-07, 00:51
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - xeno6696, 2010-03-07, 22:03
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - xeno6696, 2010-03-07, 22:25
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - David Turell, 2010-03-07, 22:31
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:26
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - David Turell, 2010-02-23, 23:03
- Method for rapid evolution - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 21:43
(1) (Introduction)- Method for rapid evolution - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:28
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 22:00
(19) (Agnosticism)- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-18, 23:02
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-18, 23:13
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - xeno6696, 2010-02-19, 00:05
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-02-21, 20:22
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 21:01
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-22, 13:48
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 14:00
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-22, 14:34
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 16:15
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-22, 14:34
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 14:00
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-02-22, 15:30
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 16:27
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - BBella, 2010-02-23, 05:22
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-23, 09:40
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-02-24, 23:24
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-25, 17:57
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-25, 18:02
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-02-28, 20:48
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-25, 17:57
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-03-06, 00:42
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-03-07, 22:35
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-02-24, 23:24
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-15, 08:21
(29) (The limitations of science)- The limitations of science - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 16:46
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-16, 17:37
- The limitations of science - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 15:41
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-24, 23:15
- The limitations of science - xeno6696, 2010-02-25, 00:54
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-24, 23:15
- The limitations of science - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 15:41
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-16, 17:37
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-15, 19:46
- The limitations of science - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 22:07
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-16, 18:10
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 00:14
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-17, 22:31
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-18, 12:20
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-18, 22:53
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-19, 11:42
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-19, 15:01
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-20, 12:47
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-20, 14:29
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-20, 16:15
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-20, 22:49
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 01:21
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-21, 16:54
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 17:38
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-20, 14:29
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-20, 12:47
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-19, 15:24
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-25, 23:44
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-28, 21:01
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-03-01, 17:31
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-03-02, 23:31
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-28, 21:01
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-25, 23:44
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-19, 15:01
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-19, 11:42
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-18, 22:53
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-18, 12:20
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-17, 22:31
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 00:14
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-17, 23:39
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-18, 11:50
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 13:53
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-18, 11:50
- The limitations of science - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 16:46
- Spirituality and the Brain - George Jelliss, 2010-02-13, 22:05
(3) (Identity)- Spirituality and the Brain - David Turell, 2010-02-14, 01:25
- Spirituality and the Brain - dhw, 2010-02-15, 08:50
- Spirituality and the Brain - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 16:23
- Can one do tree of life from fossils alone - David Turell, 2010-02-13, 19:34
(4) (Introduction)- Can one do tree of life from fossils alone - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 20:55
- Can one do tree of life from fossils alone - BBella, 2010-02-15, 23:29
- Can one do tree of life from fossils alone - George Jelliss, 2010-02-20, 23:14
- Can one do tree of life from fossils alone - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 01:11
- Can one do tree of life from fossils alone - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 20:55
- Is punctuated equilibrium explained? - David Turell, 2010-02-12, 14:39
(0) (Introduction)
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 22:20
(26) (Evolution)- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:44
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-17, 22:38
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-18, 01:25
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-20, 12:38
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-20, 19:00
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-20, 19:50
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-20, 22:01
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 17:38
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 20:53
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 22:38
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 01:08
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-22, 22:59
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-23, 01:11
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-23, 03:24
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-23, 21:55
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-23, 03:24
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-23, 01:11
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-22, 22:59
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 01:08
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 22:38
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 20:53
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 17:38
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-21, 17:06
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 18:07
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-22, 14:14
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 16:06
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-24, 23:10
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-25, 00:49
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-25, 18:27
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-25, 00:49
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-24, 23:10
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 16:06
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-22, 14:14
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 19:44
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 22:51
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 00:45
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-22, 23:05
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 00:45
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 22:51
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 18:07
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-20, 22:01
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-20, 12:38
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-18, 01:25
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-17, 22:38
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:44
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 21:41
(45) (The limitations of science)- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-13, 21:28
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 23:00
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-14, 12:51
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-14, 16:48
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-14, 23:48
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 03:19
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-15, 19:34
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 21:33
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-16, 18:12
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-16, 21:59
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-16, 23:39
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 02:52
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:30
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 17:39
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 18:42
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 21:44
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-18, 01:12
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 06:01
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-18, 11:53
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-18, 12:29
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 13:58
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-18, 11:53
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 21:44
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 18:42
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 17:39
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:30
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 03:11
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 04:00
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 02:52
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-16, 23:39
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-16, 21:59
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-16, 18:12
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 21:33
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-15, 19:34
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 03:19
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-14, 23:48
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-14, 16:48
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-14, 12:51
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-25, 23:05
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-02, 23:39
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-03-02, 23:59
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-03, 16:11
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-03-03, 23:11
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-04, 03:55
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-04, 14:54
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-06, 15:17
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-06, 22:20
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-06, 15:17
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-03-03, 23:11
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-03, 16:11
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-03, 15:35
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-04, 14:45
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-04, 22:23
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-05, 21:40
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-06, 00:37
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-06, 22:07
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-07, 00:08
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-07, 22:43
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-08, 00:07
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-08, 20:01
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-10, 17:28
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-03-11, 01:17
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-12, 13:53
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-10, 17:28
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-08, 20:01
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-08, 00:07
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-07, 22:43
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-07, 00:08
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-06, 22:07
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-06, 00:37
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-05, 21:40
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-04, 22:23
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-04, 14:45
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-03-02, 23:59
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-02, 23:39
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 23:00
- Refutation of the "Language-Only" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-13, 21:28
- Thermal vents theory for origin of life - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 21:20
(2) (Introduction)- Thermal vents theory for origin of life - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:37
- Thermal vents theory for origin of life - David Turell, 2010-02-27, 14:12
- How to avoid lost entries - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 16:50
(2) (Introduction)- How to avoid lost entries - xeno6696, 2010-02-09, 03:15
- How to avoid lost entries - dhw, 2010-02-09, 11:35
- How to avoid lost entries - xeno6696, 2010-02-09, 03:15
- Behavioral Evolution Displayed in Robots - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 20:48
(2) (Introduction)- Behavioral Evolution Displayed in Robots - dhw, 2010-02-02, 12:25
- Behavioral Evolution Displayed in Robots - xeno6696, 2010-02-03, 03:36
- Behavioral Evolution Displayed in Robots - dhw, 2010-02-02, 12:25
- Language - dhw, 2010-01-28, 11:10
(4) (General)- Language - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 12:28
- Language - dhw, 2010-02-03, 12:33
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - David Turell, 2010-01-26, 17:21
(5) (Introduction)- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 14:04
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - David Turell, 2010-02-01, 14:52
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 15:55
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 16:05
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - David Turell, 2010-02-02, 16:16
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 15:55
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - David Turell, 2010-02-01, 14:52
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 14:04
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 14:43
(40) (Introduction)- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 17:17
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 19:28
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 19:48
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-26, 19:32
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-27, 14:59
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-28, 17:07
- Back to irreducible complexity - dhw, 2010-01-29, 17:25
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-01-29, 17:31
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-01-30, 14:47
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-01-31, 11:54
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-01-31, 17:25
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-01-31, 11:54
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 02:51
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 04:46
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 13:00
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 16:46
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:33
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:13
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:37
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-09, 02:43
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 16:42
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:13
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:33
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-09, 11:42
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-09, 11:57
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 00:37
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-10, 14:04
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 17:48
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-11, 11:02
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 20:49
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-23, 09:35
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:19
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-23, 09:35
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 20:49
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-11, 11:02
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 17:48
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-10, 14:04
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 16:46
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 13:00
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-08, 13:14
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:17
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:01
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:17
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 04:46
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-01-30, 14:47
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-01-29, 17:31
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-02, 14:52
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-05, 23:33
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-06, 01:19
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-05, 23:33
- Back to irreducible complexity - dhw, 2010-01-29, 17:25
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-28, 17:07
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-27, 14:59
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 19:28
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-02-16, 11:43
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-16, 14:52
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:50
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 05:56
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-19, 19:13
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 05:56
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:50
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-16, 14:52
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 17:17
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 14:36
(42) (Introduction)- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 16:58
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 19:23
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 20:11
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 19:23
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - dhw, 2010-01-24, 11:45
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-01-24, 14:46
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - BBella, 2010-01-24, 21:32
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-01-25, 18:29
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-01-26, 01:36
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-01-30, 20:23
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - dhw, 2010-01-31, 11:41
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-03, 14:24
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - dhw, 2010-02-05, 12:05
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-06, 20:28
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - dhw, 2010-02-07, 14:52
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-07, 15:05
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-10, 15:02
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 22:28
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-11, 14:43
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 02:09
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-13, 04:13
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-13, 14:49
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 16:40
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-13, 17:26
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 19:01
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-14, 14:26
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-14, 18:00
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-14, 18:53
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 03:26
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-15, 04:36
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 04:59
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-15, 15:08
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 04:59
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-15, 04:36
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 03:26
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-14, 18:53
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-14, 18:00
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-14, 14:26
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 19:01
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-13, 17:26
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 16:40
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 04:54
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-15, 15:05
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-15, 15:14
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 15:50
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-15, 15:05
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-13, 14:49
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-13, 04:13
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 02:09
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-11, 14:43
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - dhw, 2010-02-11, 17:55
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-24, 01:54
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-24, 01:57
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 16:20
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-25, 13:55
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-03-05, 01:12
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-03-05, 14:10
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-03-05, 01:12
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-25, 13:55
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 16:20
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-24, 01:57
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 22:28
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-10, 15:02
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-07, 15:05
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - dhw, 2010-02-05, 12:05
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-02-03, 14:24
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - dhw, 2010-01-31, 11:41
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-01-30, 20:23
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-01-26, 01:36
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - David Turell, 2010-01-25, 18:29
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - BBella, 2010-01-24, 21:32
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-01-24, 14:46
- Politics and science; is science being corrupted? - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 16:58
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 01:54
(14) (Evolution)- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 05:00
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - dhw, 2010-01-24, 12:04
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - xeno6696, 2010-01-24, 14:42
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - David Turell, 2010-01-25, 01:05
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - xeno6696, 2010-01-25, 02:45
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - BBella, 2010-01-25, 06:17
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - xeno6696, 2010-01-26, 03:24
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - dhw, 2010-01-26, 10:07
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - dhw, 2010-01-26, 09:17
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - xeno6696, 2010-01-26, 03:24
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - David Turell, 2010-01-25, 19:12
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - BBella, 2010-01-25, 06:17
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - xeno6696, 2010-01-25, 02:45
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - dhw, 2010-01-25, 12:04
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - David Turell, 2010-01-25, 01:05
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - George Jelliss, 2010-01-25, 11:40
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - dhw, 2010-01-26, 09:07
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - xeno6696, 2010-01-24, 14:42
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - dhw, 2010-01-24, 12:04
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - David Turell, 2010-02-04, 19:28
- Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 05:00
- This One's for David - xeno6696, 2010-01-22, 23:40
(5) (General)- This One's for David - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 00:53
- This One's for David - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 16:42
- This One's for David - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 19:20
- This One's for David - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 20:22
- This One's for David - David Turell, 2010-01-25, 01:24
- This One's for David - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 20:22
- This One's for David - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 19:20
- This One's for David - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 16:42
- This One's for David - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 00:53
- Gravity defies the standard model; a new approach - David Turell, 2010-01-22, 16:24
(3) (Introduction)- Gravity defies the standard model; a new approach - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 01:12
- Gravity defies the standard model; a new approach - George Jelliss, 2010-01-24, 11:44
- Gravity defies the standard model; a new approach - dhw, 2010-01-25, 11:56
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-18, 01:57
(16) (Religion)- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - David Turell, 2010-01-18, 16:02
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-18, 18:11
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - dhw, 2010-01-20, 13:00
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-20, 15:51
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - David Turell, 2010-01-20, 17:16
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-20, 20:18
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - dhw, 2010-01-22, 11:32
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 19:44
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - dhw, 2010-01-24, 12:08
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-24, 15:17
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - dhw, 2010-01-24, 12:08
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 19:44
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - David Turell, 2010-01-20, 17:16
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-20, 15:51
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - dhw, 2010-01-20, 13:00
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-18, 18:11
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - dhw, 2010-01-18, 16:08
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-20, 00:28
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - David Turell, 2010-01-20, 00:38
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-20, 03:14
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - dhw, 2010-01-21, 15:37
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-21, 18:15
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - David Turell, 2010-01-20, 00:38
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - xeno6696, 2010-01-20, 00:28
- Pigliucci Challenges Randomness - David Turell, 2010-01-18, 16:02
- Belgian medical team turns tail in Haiti: Disgusting. - xeno6696, 2010-01-17, 15:31
(0) (Politics)
- Business Simulation - xeno6696, 2010-01-16, 00:08
(0) (Humans)
- The Nature of this Conflict - xeno6696, 2010-01-15, 18:13
(29) (Humans)- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-17, 21:51
- The Nature of this Conflict - xeno6696, 2010-01-17, 22:21
- The Nature of this Conflict - dhw, 2010-01-19, 15:33
- The Nature of this Conflict - David Turell, 2010-01-19, 16:24
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-19, 20:20
- The Nature of this Conflict - xeno6696, 2010-01-19, 23:48
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-20, 18:14
- The Nature of this Conflict - xeno6696, 2010-01-20, 20:50
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-21, 11:45
- The Nature of this Conflict - xeno6696, 2010-01-22, 02:05
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-21, 11:45
- The Nature of this Conflict - xeno6696, 2010-01-20, 20:50
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-20, 18:14
- The Nature of this Conflict - David Turell, 2010-01-20, 00:58
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-20, 18:27
- The Nature of this Conflict - David Turell, 2010-01-20, 19:57
- The Nature of this Conflict - David Turell, 2010-02-06, 01:03
- The Nature of this Conflict - David Turell, 2010-02-07, 18:43
- The Nature of this Conflict - xeno6696, 2010-02-07, 19:10
- The Nature of this Conflict - David Turell, 2010-02-07, 18:43
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-20, 18:27
- The Nature of this Conflict - dhw, 2010-01-20, 13:13
- The Nature of this Conflict - xeno6696, 2010-01-20, 16:09
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-20, 18:36
- The Nature of this Conflict - xeno6696, 2010-01-20, 21:58
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-20, 18:36
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-20, 17:56
- The Nature of this Conflict - dhw, 2010-01-21, 15:45
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-22, 00:49
- The Nature of this Conflict - dhw, 2010-01-22, 12:05
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-24, 11:34
- The Nature of this Conflict - dhw, 2010-01-25, 11:52
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-24, 11:34
- The Nature of this Conflict - dhw, 2010-01-22, 12:05
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-22, 00:49
- The Nature of this Conflict - dhw, 2010-01-21, 15:45
- The Nature of this Conflict - xeno6696, 2010-01-20, 16:09
- The Nature of this Conflict - xeno6696, 2010-01-19, 23:48
- The Nature of this Conflict - dhw, 2010-01-20, 13:06
- The Nature of this Conflict - David Turell, 2010-01-20, 14:49
- The Nature of this Conflict - xeno6696, 2010-01-20, 16:34
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-19, 20:20
- The Nature of this Conflict - David Turell, 2010-01-19, 16:24
- The Nature of this Conflict - George Jelliss, 2010-01-17, 21:51