God and Energy (The nature of a \'Creator\')

by GateKeeper , Friday, June 06, 2014, 16:58 (3611 days ago) @ dhw


> 
> Again as an agnostic I fully accept your point that you cannot base conclusions on unknowns ... but theists and atheists alike do precisely that. You have told us that you yourself are a believer, so you must have done it too! Won't you stick to your philosophical principles and join me on the fence? Or at least tell us why you have drawn your theistic conclusions?
>>-I will try. how is this ref?-
Yes they do, don't they.-I am not a theist. We just don't know enough for that stance yet. For me, the truth lies in between theist and atheist. I choose to state both have parts of it right. Instead of "they are wrong". -I use rom's monist and the pluralist view to state that we are part of a larger life form. And every new discovery gets it one step closer to fact. If space itself is a "thing". well then ... It must be alive because we are. -I am not really a good "if-then" guy. When the "if's" have no constraints it confuses me.