God & Particles (The nature of a \'Creator\')

by GateKeeper , Sunday, June 08, 2014, 23:59 (3599 days ago) @ romansh
edited by unknown, Monday, June 09, 2014, 00:10

I am not sure who this is aimed at? 
> > yes, sorry about that. I was confused. Your take is fine.
> > 
> > I disagree with the papers "pure light". That is not exactly true. Or at least accepted by most. I would be shocked if tyson said "pure light".
> 
> I did not use the phrase pure light, not sure what an impure light would be.
> > My slant is a little different than yours. I use don't use the word "pure energy" as you are here. but if it is good enough for you guys, then so be it. 
> What is impure energy? 
> > I also don't use radioactivity in the manor you do. Stored "big bang" stuff is cool. that is as far as I will go. It does not show the universe was "created".
> This must be aimed at David? 
> > You have to show me exactly what was working in an coherent manor "outside" of this universe to create us. The QM take, or this thing working in a QM environment would also have to be explained in a "something we know based" model. That being exactly what is working in QM model. 
> Outside of the universe .... ????? 
> > 
> > The qm model is based on probability and waving. So how is this creator working in that environment?
> > 
> > I use the word god because of the baggage. If we reject a stance because we don't like a word. We may just have to step back and think about what we are rejecting. Thae data? or the "something else". Like I have to do with the word "science".-dern it ...sorry did I forgot to quote it again. Dont the reposes go right under the post?-The link used the words "light". I don't tyson would have used those words either.-Define "pure energy" first. please. I didn't say "impure". "energy" is not defined as they are using the word. Energy is the ability to do work. It is not a tangle "thing". They are using "pure energy" more loosely.-yes, I agree. I am having trouble understanding "outside". Or how the forces began to interact from 10^-43 to the point gravity and the weak separated. so that "it created" matter. matter is not even a thing. so I am way confused really.