Abiogenesis (Origins)

by David Turell , Saturday, September 05, 2009, 16:36 (5368 days ago) @ dhw

The problem for someone uncommitted like myself is that the more difficult these intelligent scientists find it to understand the code (and to fulfil their dream), -The problem is not the code itself. We now understand large parts of it and the new discoveries about RNA show more layers of code than were originially thought to be present. Also the new field of epigenetics would be an old field if the rigidity of Darwinism allowed Paul Kammerer's work to be critically reviewed and accepted in the 1920's.- http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/162880.php-The real problem is the starting chemistry in an inorganic world with only some organic molecules present. Unless an enzyme was also around, nothing would happen. That is why I presented the article about zinc and heat. I'm sure there were scattered areas around the world that would fit that scenario. It is my theory that all of these approaches must be tried over many years, and we are approaching 70 years now, before it is realized there can be no answer known to us. BUT, and I meant A BIG BUT, even if we stumbled on a man-made way to make life, we must consider that perhaps there is more than one way, so we will never be sure what really happened.