Home | Log in | Register

AgnosticWeb.com

Intro | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Forum

Back to the forum index

Natural Selection and what it didn't do for dogs... (Evolution)

by David Turell @, Thursday, February 04, 2010, 19:28 @ xeno6696
edited by David Turell, Thursday, February 04, 2010, 19:34


If it takes at worst, 40,000 years to get a pug from a wolf, why can't natural selection be seen as a sufficient force for change?

Any thoughts?

And now a new book with lots of negative comments about Darwin and his theory:


http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527466.100-survival-of-the-fittest-theory-darwi...

"What Darwin Got Wrong" by Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini. Lots of reasonable negative comments after the article, But to me both the article and the comments reinforce my contention that the process is completely passive.

  215 views

Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

3854 Postings in 258 Threads, 36 registered users, 7 users online (0 registered, 7 guests)
RSS Feed  Thread starts | Contact (non forum topics)
Site Co-ordinator: WebCracker Ltd    Forum: powered by my little forum    Links: Related topics