Computing with DNA (Introduction)
And I mean that literally. We now have the ability to write programs with DNA.-http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2011/05/16/nyu-researchers-outline-method-for-dna-computation-in-new-book.html
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
Computing with DNA
And I mean that literally. We now have the ability to write programs with DNA. > > http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2011/05/16/nyu-researchers-outline-meth... is amazing stuff. It is a digital code, differing from 0&1 codes. But how much is 'junk' and what does that prove. Moran is debating the validity of the statements in Jonathan Wells' book, The Myth of Junk DNA.-http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/ today
Computing with DNA
And I mean that literally. We now have the ability to write programs with DNA. > > > > http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2011/05/16/nyu-researchers-outline-meth... > DNA is amazing stuff. It is a digital code, differing from 0&1 codes. But how much is 'junk' and what does that prove. Moran is debating the validity of the statements in Jonathan Wells' book, The Myth of Junk DNA. > > http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/ today-Clearly wasn't meant for me... "Junk" DNA I learned was a source of cell development and mediation functions. It was only junk from the perspective of the Central Dogma.
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
Computing with DNA
And I mean that literally. We now have the ability to write programs with DNA. > > > > > > http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2011/05/16/nyu-researchers-outline-meth... > > > DNA is amazing stuff. It is a digital code, differing from 0&1 codes. But how much is 'junk' and what does that prove. Moran is debating the validity of the statements in Jonathan Wells' book, The Myth of Junk DNA. > > > > http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/ today > > Clearly wasn't meant for me... "Junk" DNA I learned was a source of cell development and mediation functions. It was only junk from the perspective of the Central Dogma.-And here is a refutation of Moran:-http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2011/05/education-of-science-writer.html