Kent Hovind vs. a Molecular Biologist (The limitations of science)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Wednesday, July 06, 2011, 20:41 (4677 days ago) @ xeno6696

Let's leave the concept of perfection out of it then and work on what we 'know'.-In one of your earlier post you mentioned bacterial life being about 1Bn years old, which I do not disagree with. 
We also know that there was a vast explosion of new life forms all at or around the same period.(Much faster than mainstream evolutionary theory can account for.) 
We also know that there has not been such an expansion of new life since that point, and in fact we have lost over a third of all pre-existing phyla. 
We also know that mutations are negative.
We also know that there is no proven case of speciation.
We also know that there genetic differences between species either prevent reproduction, produce sterile offspring, or produce offspring that while perhaps fertile, are not genetically compatible with existing mates, thus preventing the expansion of the lineage. -
Assumptions:-That primitive species of the taxonomic phyla of Homo are ancestors of modern Humans. -That any living creature, genetically, is better adapted to environment than their originating ancestor. -That the formation of complex organisms and complex structures could occur in such a manner as to facilitate the formation of 50+ different phyla in much less time than biologically feasible. -That technological superiority equals evolutionary advancement. -
Clarifications Requiredo minor genetic differences, such as coloration, size, hair type, personality traits, that do not preclude successful reproduction, constitute speciation, or like humans, do we consider those with similar variations as the same species instead of cousins in the same phyla?-What criteria are being applied to qualify species with adaptations/genetic changes as higher up the evolutionary chain, other than chronology?