<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Understanding the brain</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Understanding the brain</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.ketyov.com/2012/06/defending-jonah-lehrer.html-http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/num2/2012/4/the-manifest-destiny-of-artificial-intelligence/1-Neither">http://blog.ketyov.com/2012/06/defending-jonah-lehrer.html-http://www.americanscientist...</a> of these articles require comment further than that presented by them. I&amp;apos;m still with Tallis and Penrose. Artificial conscousness will never happen. Calling it AI only confuses the issue. Intelligence= consciousness, never!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=10737</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=10737</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 14:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
