<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Confusing hominins</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Confusing hominins (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More evidence that A. Afarensis both walked upright and climbed trees, from a young scapula:-http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/33017/title/Acrobatic-Ancestors-/-http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121025150353.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11338</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11338</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Confusing hominins</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review of a confusing subject. Main point I get is the authors think the early forms are often too humanized in the depiction of &amp;apos;what might have been&amp;apos;, which is in large part guess work.-http://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/07/the_fragmented_062101.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=10905</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=10905</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
