<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Nagel Reviews Plantinga</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Nagel Reviews Plantinga</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&amp;quot;I say this as someone who cannot imagine believing what he believes. But even those who cannot&amp;#13;&amp;#10;accept the theist alternative should admit that Plantinga&amp;apos;s criticisms of naturalism are directed at the&amp;#13;&amp;#10;deepest problem with that view&amp;#226;&amp;#128;&amp;#148;how it can account for the appearance, through the operation of&amp;#13;&amp;#10;the laws of physics and chemistry, of conscious beings like ourselves, capable of discovering those&amp;#13;&amp;#10;laws and understanding the universe that they govern. Defenders of naturalism have not ignored&amp;#13;&amp;#10;this problem, but I believe that so far, even with the aid of evolutionary theory, they have not&amp;#13;&amp;#10;proposed a credible solution. Perhaps theism and materialist naturalism are not the only alternatives.&amp;quot;-https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1258861/Nagel_Plantinga.pdf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11115</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11115</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
