<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Dark energy \'proven\'</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Dark energy \'proven\' (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAVID: <em>Using a specialized technique, dark energy is over 99% certain:</em>-http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120912084759.htm-&amp;#13;&amp;#10;The following caught my eye as a rather rich parallel. The thoughts that follow the quote are not meant as a comment on the team or on its research, but on a general mindset that from my agnostic standpoint seems to have become increasingly prevalent in the scientific community.-&amp;quot;<em>Professor Bob Nichol, a member of the Portsmouth team, said: &amp;quot;Dark energy is one of the great scientific mysteries of our time, so it isn&amp;apos;t surprising that so many researchers question its existence.&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&amp;quot;But with our new work we&amp;apos;re more confident than ever that this exotic component of the Universe is real -- even if we still have no idea what it consists of.</em>&amp;quot;-Something or the other brought the universe into existence. Something or the other brought life into existence. Something or the other brought consciousness into existence. That &amp;quot;something or the other&amp;quot; is one of the <strong>great scientific mysteries </strong>of all times. Some people call it Nature, some people call it Chance, and you could even call it &amp;quot;<strong>dark matter</strong>&amp;quot;, since the term can mean anything. <strong>We can be confident that this exotic component of the Universe is real </strong>(exotic = we don&amp;apos;t understand it), because we can see the results for ourselves. <strong>We have no idea what it consists of</strong>, but some people are quite sure it doesn&amp;apos;t know what it&amp;apos;s doing, so it can&amp;apos;t be called God. That would be unscientific.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11123</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11123</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>dhw</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dark energy \'proven\'</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a specialized technique, dark energy is ovr 99% certain:-http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120912084759.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11116</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11116</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
