<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Cambrian worms</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Cambrian worms (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These worms have not widely diversified since the Cambrian. They were <strong>diversified in the Cambrian</strong>. Darwin presents a cone-like development of diversity in his theory, but certain data from evolution such as this presentation implies that various areas of evolution may be cylindrical in development.-http://www.arn.org/blogs/index.php/literature/2012/10/11/priapulids_challenge_the_cone_of_increas-More evidence of long term stasis of oceanic forms:-http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121010172116.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11238</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11238</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cambrian worms</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the way from 505 million years ago, these worms show little change:-http://phys.org/news/2012-10-marine-worms-reveal-deepest-evolutionary.html-Apparently they were never destined to be very complex. Is evolution pre-programmed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11227</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11227</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
