<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Consciousness: Ned block video</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Consciousness: Ned block video (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very thoughtful,with more videos to come:-http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2013/01/28/what-is-consciousness-go-to-the-video/?WT_mc_id=SA_DD_20130128</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=12133</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=12133</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Consciousness: attention (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One does not need a whole cortex to be conscious and have self-awareness, the simple definition of consciousness.-http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=self-awareness-with-a-simple-brain&amp;page=2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11541</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11541</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Consciousness: attention (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; However, we won&amp;apos;t even consider the possibility that there might be something other than neurons directing the neurons. There is definitely no &amp;quot;ghost&amp;quot; in the brain.&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;  &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; I don&amp;apos;t know if there is or isn&amp;apos;t a &amp;quot;ghost&amp;quot; in the brain, and I don&amp;apos;t know if NDEs and OBEs and other so-called paranormal phenomena are or are not reliable evidence that the mind is not just a matter of neurons. However, I do know that science is meant to be objective, and the totally unnecessary statement above (in bold) therefore has no place in a scientific study.-I interpret the blog differently. It concludes:-&amp;quot;What was thought before was that three brain areas in sequence were sufficient to produce visual attention in monkeys.&amp;#13;&amp;#10; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;What remains unknown?&amp;#13;&amp;#10; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;First, what other brain areas handle visual attention that is triggered by an overt cue.  Second, when there&amp;apos;s no cue, what aims the &amp;quot;searchlight of attention&amp;quot; that humans seem to control freely?&amp;quot;-I view this as an admission we have no idea what is going on although we&amp;apos;d like to believe it is all materialism. The admission is what is significant to me.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11249</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11249</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Consciousness: attention (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAVID: <em>Studies continue to show that if it seems three regions of the brain are involved there are really more to find:</em>&amp;#13;&amp;#10; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2012/10/10/how-the-brain-does-attention-is-still-unknown/?WT_mc_id=SA_DD_20121010-This article begins as follows:-<em>Humans can focus on one thing amidst many.  &amp;quot;Searchlight of attention&amp;quot; is the metaphor.  You recall a childhood friend&amp;apos;s face one moment, then perhaps the dog you loved back then, and then...what you will. Your son&amp;apos;s face on stage rivets your attention; the rest of the cast is unseen.</em>-<em><strong>No &amp;quot;ghost&amp;quot; in the brain aims that searchlight.</strong> </em>[My bold] <em>What does?  Neurons do, somehow, but how is a mystery that new research actually deepened.</em>-This a scientific article in a scientific journal, but note how science is used as a cover for sheer prejudice. For the &amp;quot;searchlight of attention&amp;quot; you could substitute will, memory, imagination, consciousness, and this author would tell you the same: we haven&amp;apos;t a clue how it works, and the more we try to prove our theory that it&amp;apos;s all a matter of neurons, the less our theory seems to fit the facts. However, we won&amp;apos;t even consider the possibility that there might be something other than neurons directing the neurons. There is definitely no &amp;quot;ghost&amp;quot; in the brain.&amp;#13;&amp;#10; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;I don&amp;apos;t know if there is or isn&amp;apos;t a &amp;quot;ghost&amp;quot; in the brain, and I don&amp;apos;t know if NDEs and OBEs and other so-called paranormal phenomena are or are not reliable evidence that the mind is not just a matter of neurons. However, I do know that science is meant to be objective, and the totally unnecessary statement above (in bold) therefore has no place in a scientific study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11247</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11247</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>dhw</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Consciousness: attention</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Studies continue to show that if it seems three regions of the brain are involved there are really more to find:-http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2012/10/10/how-the-brain-does-attention-is-still-unknown/?WT_mc_id=SA_DD_20121010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11236</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11236</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
