<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Frantically hunting multiverses</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Frantically hunting multiverses</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&amp;quot;Despite this excitement, Kleban warns that there are a number of reasons why we might not see any signs of universe collisions. First, our universe might truly be the only one. Or the signal from a collision may be too faint because the crash occurred too far away. Even if they are out there, finding signatures of other universes is a long shot, Kleban acknowledges. &amp;quot;The best reason for hope,&amp;quot; he says, &amp;quot;is that we can&amp;apos;t conclude it&amp;apos;s hopeless.&amp;quot; And that is saying something, when you are searching beyond the edge of everything we know.&amp;quot;-http://discovermagazine.com/2012/dec/29-when-universes-collide#.ULZ8RtPjknV-No evidence of cosmic wave background circles of collisions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11521</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11521</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
