<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Government science complex</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Government science complex (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many article retractions from a human aspect: too many poeple chasing to little government expected grant money:-http://www.forbes.com/sites/billfrezza/2014/07/13/bad-science-muckrakers-question-the-big-science-status-quo/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16429</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16429</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Government science complex</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government grants research money from our taxes, and then we have topay a third party to read the articles. Crazy. Free access needed and only fair, but then what happens to peer review, as if I care? -http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/31858/title/Opinion--Academic-Publishing-Is-Broken-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11817</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=11817</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
