<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - General relativity vs. quantum mechanics</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>General relativity vs. quantum mechanics</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very new and complex method to try and reconcile the two. Loop quantum gravity, string theory and others may fit into this. Finally, an advance?--&amp;quot;spectral geometry ... a field in mathematics which concerns relationships between geometric structures of manifolds and spectra of canonically defined differential operators ... may resolve this long-standing quandary by allowing spacetime to be treated as simultaneously continuous and discrete, essentially relating the frequency-based ringing of the fabric of spacetime to its manifold-based shape. Recently, scientists at California Institute of Technology, Princeton University, University of Waterloo, and University of Queensland normalized and segmented spectral geometry into small, finite-dimensional steps. They then demonstrated their approach of calculating the shapes of two-dimensional objects from their vibrational spectra as being viable in two, and possibly more, dimensions.&amp;quot;&amp;#13;&amp;#10; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;Read more at: <a href="http://phys.org/news/2013-04-gravity-lingua-franca-relativity-quantum.html#jCp">http://phys.org/news/2013-04-gravity-lingua-franca-relativity-quantum.html#jCp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=12767</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=12767</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
