<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Structuralism in nature</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Structuralism in nature</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite Michael Denton on patterns of structure underlying evoluiton:-CONCLUSION&amp;#13;&amp;#10;The primary structuralist premise that life&amp;apos;s basic forms are a&amp;#13;&amp;#10;natural and lawful part of the order of the world is a perfectly&amp;#13;&amp;#10;rational and naturalistic conception&amp;#226;&amp;#128;&amp;#148;every bit as rational,&amp;#13;&amp;#10;surely, as the post-Darwinian denial of life&amp;apos;s fundamental lawfulness&amp;#13;&amp;#10;and naturalness, and the post-1859 reassignment of&amp;#13;&amp;#10;organisms from the realm of nature to the realm of the artifact.&amp;#13;&amp;#10;Future researchers may well look back in astonishment at&amp;#13;&amp;#10;the post-Darwinian era in which most biologists deemed life&amp;apos;s&amp;#13;&amp;#10;forms mere artifacts of time and chance, with no less significance&amp;#13;&amp;#10;in the cosmic order than a wind-blown pattern of leaves.&amp;#13;&amp;#10;Although no biologist can deny that adaptation is ubiquitous&amp;#13;&amp;#10;in the living world, the Darwinian claim that ALL organic order,&amp;#13;&amp;#10;including the deep homologies, can be reduced to functionalist&amp;#13;&amp;#10;explanations is far from compelling. After 150 years of focused&amp;#13;&amp;#10;functionalist effort, the grand taxonomic system and the&amp;#13;&amp;#10;ascending hierarchy of homologous patterns has still not been&amp;#13;&amp;#10;adequately accounted for in functionalist/adaptive/Darwinian&amp;#13;&amp;#10;terms.&amp;#13;&amp;#10;The evidence presented in this review has highlighted the following&amp;#13;&amp;#10;observations: the profound fitness of the laws of nature&amp;#13;&amp;#10;for life as it exists on earth, revealed by advances in 20th-century&amp;#13;&amp;#10;cosmology, fundamental physics, and biochemistry; the failure&amp;#13;&amp;#10;to find the elusive genetic blueprints demanded of the functionalist&amp;#13;&amp;#10;paradigm; the revelation that at least some of the core&amp;#13;&amp;#10;molecular, cellular, and even higher organismic forms of life&amp;#13;&amp;#10;are the emergent result of the self-organization of matter; and&amp;#13;&amp;#10;the developmental robustness of the type, a robustness which&amp;#13;&amp;#10;recent advances have re-emphasized. When these observations&amp;#13;&amp;#10;are taken in conjunction with the &amp;apos;primal failure&amp;apos; of the functionalist/&amp;#13;&amp;#10;adaptationist paradigm to explain the deep homologies&amp;#13;&amp;#10;and the existence of types, it is hard to refuse the possibility&amp;#13;&amp;#10;that the 21st century will witness a full-scale structuralist revival.&amp;#13;&amp;#10;Perhaps the metaphor of the crystal may yet eclipse the metaphor&amp;#13;&amp;#10;of the watch, and the grand taxonomic system return to&amp;#13;&amp;#10;its proper ontological status as an intrinsic part of the timeless&amp;#13;&amp;#10;order of nature.-http://bio-complexity.org/ojs/index.php/main/article/view/BIO-C.2013.3/BIO-C.2013.3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=14548</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=14548</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
