<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Combine quantum theory and relativity?</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Combine quantum theory and relativity? (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a reversion to the nineteenth century idea of the aether, which physicists and mathematicians like Kelvin, Tait and Clifford tried to explain in terms of vortices, or smoke rings, or knots and suchlike. It also sounds a bit like string theory, which is similar to these old theories in a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16129</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16129</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 20:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>George Jelliss</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Combine quantum theory and relativity?</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spacetime as a superfluid. A struggle for answers:-http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/superfluid-spacetime-relativity-quantum-physics/?&amp;WT.mc_id=SA_DD_20140618</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16121</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16121</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
