<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Glycon</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Glycon (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GEORGE: <em>I like the idea that any metaphysical conversation about  a supposed origin of the universe, or whether something can come from nothing, is all basically meaningless and can never be rationally resolved,  because there is an irrational paradox involved.</em>-GK: <em>I always thought &quot;paradox&quot; as limits in our understanding. So I think of them as &quot;human paradox&amp;apos;s&quot; not universal ones.</em>-Well, you&amp;apos;re both right in my eyes. There has to be a valid answer, and we shall never know what it is. You can take that as a good argument in favour of agnosticism for those who don&amp;apos;t feel the need to make a decision, and a good argument in favour of faith for those who do feel the need. Great ... we are all winners!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16151</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16151</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
<category>A mad world</category><dc:creator>dhw</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Glycon (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Errm Yes.  &gt; But that&amp;apos;s nothing to do with Glycon the poet!  &gt; There are also pages on the internet about Glycon the chemical.  &gt; All very interesting I&amp;apos;m sure, but hardly relevant.  &gt;  &gt; I like the idea that any metaphysical conversation about  &gt; a supposed origin of the universe, or whether something can come from nothing, &gt; is all basically meaningless and can never be rationally resolved,  &gt; because there is an irrational paradox involved.-I always thought &quot;paradox&quot; as limits in our understanding.  So I think of them as &quot;human paradox&amp;apos;s&quot; not universal ones.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16148</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16148</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2014 01:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
<category>A mad world</category><dc:creator>GateKeeper</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Glycon (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errm Yes.  But that&amp;apos;s nothing to do with Glycon the poet!  There are also pages on the internet about Glycon the chemical.  All very interesting I&amp;apos;m sure, but hardly relevant. -I like the idea that any metaphysical conversation about  a supposed origin of the universe, or whether something can come from nothing, is all basically meaningless and can never be rationally resolved,  because there is an irrational paradox involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16144</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16144</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 20:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
<category>A mad world</category><dc:creator>George Jelliss</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Glycon (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><p>George: Anyone know any more?-Wikipedia has a section about Glycon the snake god culture:-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycon</p>
</blockquote></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16135</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16135</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>A mad world</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Glycon (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Reading &quot;Europe: A History&quot; by Norman Davies  &gt; I came across a Greek quotation (p.115)  &gt; which in a translation by Peter Jay says:  &gt;  &gt; Everything&amp;apos;s laughter, everything dust, everything nothing.  &gt; Out of unreason comes everything that exists. &gt;  &gt; I find this quite an attractive philosophy.  &gt; I may give up rationalism in favour of this.  &gt; A sort of paradoxicalism? &gt;  &gt; Apparently these two lines of verse  &gt; are all that is known of Glycon. &gt;  &gt; <a href="http://catalog.perseus.org/catalog/Mtlg0194Glyco">http://catalog.perseus.org/catalog/Mtlg0194Glyco</a> &gt;  &gt; Anyone know any more?-Yep.-I settled on the notion that I die not knowing so enjoy and get the next generation ready.  We all do this in a way; so why do we fight over such things?</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16130</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16130</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 20:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
<category>A mad world</category><dc:creator>GateKeeper</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Glycon</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading &quot;Europe: A History&quot; by Norman Davies  I came across a Greek quotation (p.115)  which in a translation by Peter Jay says: -Everything&amp;apos;s laughter, everything dust, everything nothing.  Out of unreason comes everything that exists.-I find this quite an attractive philosophy.  I may give up rationalism in favour of this.  A sort of paradoxicalism?-Apparently these two lines of verse  are all that is known of Glycon.-http://catalog.perseus.org/catalog/Mtlg0194Glyco-Anyone know any more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16128</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=16128</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 20:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
<category>A mad world</category><dc:creator>George Jelliss</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
