<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Latest DNA research</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Latest DNA research</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ancient DNA is being studied from thousands of years ago with the latest techniques:-http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/43069/title/What-s-Old-Is-New-Again/-&amp;quot;Researchers are also beginning to apply their newfound skills in dealing with ancient materials to branch out beyond simply sequencing genomes. In 2012, for example, Willerslev&amp;apos;s lab published an analysis of proteins, which are generally longer lived postmortem than genetic material, of 43,000-year-old woolly mammoth bones.16 And last year, Willerslev, Orlando, and colleagues published a genome-wide nucleosome map and survey of cytosine methylation levels in the DNA they pulled from the 4,000-year-old hair shafts of a Paleo-Eskimo, effectively launching the field of ancient epigenetics.17 Also last year, P&amp;#228;&amp;#228;bo&amp;apos;s group at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology published the first full DNA methylation maps of the Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes.18 &amp;#147;For the first time we&amp;apos;ll be able to address what is the role of epigenomics and epigenetics in evolution,&amp;#148; Willerslev says.-&amp;quot;But just how far back into biological history will ancient DNA researchers be able to reach? Most scientists feel that recovering sequenceable DNA isn&amp;apos;t likely in samples more than 1,000 millennia in age. &amp;#147;I would bet all my money that 1 million is the limit,&amp;#148; says Meyer. But some are confident that further improvements to DNA isolation and sequencing techniques could take us even further back. &amp;#147;It would not surprise me if we were able to sequence DNA older than 1 million years given appropriate environmental conditions,&amp;#148; Malhi says. Willerslev agrees, speculating that researchers may eventually be able to sequence DNA collected from samples dating to 2 million years ago. &amp;#147;I wouldn&amp;apos;t be surprised at all.&amp;apos;&amp;#148; &amp;#8;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=18991</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=18991</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
