<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Shakespeare didn\'t work alone...</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Shakespeare didn\'t work alone... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Matt: &amp;quot;<em>Analysis of writing style shows some discrepancies</em>.&amp;quot;&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Not that it has much to do with agnosticism, but I wonder why this subject has hit the headlines anyway. &amp;quot;Discrepancies&amp;quot; is a bit misleading ... as if something&amp;apos;s wrong somewhere. As the article indicates, <em>Edward III </em>has long been regarded as a joint effort, and it&amp;apos;s generally accepted that Shakespeare probably collaborated on other plays, like <em>Henry VIII </em>and <em>Two Noble Kinsmen</em>. There was nothing unusual in playwrights working together at that time. Beaumont and Fletcher were probably the best known pair, and John Fletcher was almost certainly one of Shakespeare&amp;apos;s collaborators. The Bard may also have written part of <em>Sir Thomas More</em>. Even in <em>Macbeth</em>, which is as Shakespearian as a Shakespeare play can get, we know that Thomas Middleton later interpolated the witch songs, and almost certainly the silly Hecate scenes ... silly because they tell us nothing we don&amp;apos;t already know or are about to learn. That said, Hecate has a couple of great lines that might make for an interesting discussion:&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;     &amp;quot;And you all know, security&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;      Is mortals&amp;apos; chiefest enemy.&amp;quot;-I think the grander reason it was news was the method used to find it out.  It&amp;apos;s not often you hear of computers mixing with high theatre.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=2393</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=2393</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Humans</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shakespeare didn\'t work alone... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt: &amp;quot;<em>Analysis of writing style shows some discrepancies</em>.&amp;quot;-Not that it has much to do with agnosticism, but I wonder why this subject has hit the headlines anyway. &amp;quot;Discrepancies&amp;quot; is a bit misleading ... as if something&amp;apos;s wrong somewhere. As the article indicates, <em>Edward III </em>has long been regarded as a joint effort, and it&amp;apos;s generally accepted that Shakespeare probably collaborated on other plays, like <em>Henry VIII </em>and <em>Two Noble Kinsmen</em>. There was nothing unusual in playwrights working together at that time. Beaumont and Fletcher were probably the best known pair, and John Fletcher was almost certainly one of Shakespeare&amp;apos;s collaborators. The Bard may also have written part of <em>Sir Thomas More</em>. Even in <em>Macbeth</em>, which is as Shakespearian as a Shakespeare play can get, we know that Thomas Middleton later interpolated the witch songs, and almost certainly the silly Hecate scenes ... silly because they tell us nothing we don&amp;apos;t already know or are about to learn. That said, Hecate has a couple of great lines that might make for an interesting discussion:&amp;#13;&amp;#10;    &amp;quot;And you all know, security&amp;#13;&amp;#10;     Is mortals&amp;apos; chiefest enemy.&amp;quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=2391</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=2391</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Humans</category><dc:creator>dhw</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shakespeare didn\'t work alone...</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/stage/article6870086.ece-Analysis">http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/stage/article6870086....</a> of writing style shows some discrepancies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=2380</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=2380</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Humans</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
