But everyone else can look, and it might be good to do so.
> 
> 
> http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427311.500-probably-guilty-bad-mathematics-mean... the pre-quiz, and was forehead-slapping before the end of it... I only got 2 right, the husband murders wife question was a trick, and the other two... I just am not on my good game. At least I understood why I was wrong on 2 of them. -Though in my defense, prior to taking the quiz I became acquainted with two fine glasses of "The Famous Grouse." -I will say this: The wording involved with probability is what you need to scrutinize the most heavily. And the less we know about a system; the less accurately we can assign a probability. -What are the odds that life self-assembled from inorganic materials? No matter how you try, there is no way to assign a probability to that statement until we know more (alot more) about that kind of chemistry.-This article also reminded me of the Illinois governor that pardoned his entire death row due to 11 bad convictions.