<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - When should Scientists share data?</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>When should Scientists share data? (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=when-should-a-scientists-data-be-li-2010-07-22&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;">http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=when-should-a-scientists-data-be-li-...</a> &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; And pressure mounts...-Great article and the whole mess calls to mind my comments about peer review, which did not exist when I was a research fellow. It results in peer control of what is published and certainly it has been clearly shown by climategate. Politicizing science is the last thing we need.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=3943</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=3943</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 01:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
<category>The limitations of science</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>When should Scientists share data?</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=when-should-a-scientists-data-be-li-2010-07-22-And">http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=when-should-a-scientists-data-be-li-...</a> pressure mounts...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=3941</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=3941</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
<category>The limitations of science</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
