<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Hawking:  \&quot;The same old CRAP.\&quot;</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Hawking:  \&quot;The same old CRAP.\&quot; (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=cosmic-clowning-stephen-hawkings-ne-2010-09-13&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;">http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=cosmic-clowning-stephen-hawkings-ne-...</a> &gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &gt; Thank you for bringing the Sci-Am comment to the group&amp;apos;s attention. The point is Hawking&amp;apos;s book is CRAP, published to make money. Every one of my objections is in the blog.&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Another take on Stephen:&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/sep/13/digested-read-grand-design-hawking&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/sep/13/digested-read-grand-design-hawking&amp;#13;...</a> &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Does anyone take this stuff seriously?-Like I was trying to tell George, &amp;quot;Hawking Ditching God&amp;quot; is old hat.</p>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=4399</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=4399</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>The limitations of science</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hawking:  \&quot;The same old CRAP.\&quot; (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=cosmic-clowning-stephen-hawkings-ne-2010-09-13&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;">http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=cosmic-clowning-stephen-hawkings-ne-...</a> &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Thank you for bringing the Sci-Am comment to the group&amp;apos;s attention. The point is Hawking&amp;apos;s book is CRAP, published to make money. Every one of my objections is in the blog.-Another take on Stephen:-http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/sep/13/digested-read-grand-design-hawking-Does anyone take this stuff seriously?</p>
</blockquote></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=4394</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=4394</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 02:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
<category>The limitations of science</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hawking:  \&quot;The same old CRAP.\&quot; (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=cosmic-clowning-stephen-hawkings-ne-2010-09-13-Thank">http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=cosmic-clowning-stephen-hawkings-ne-...</a> you for bringing the Sci-Am comment to the group&amp;apos;s attention. The point is Hawking&amp;apos;s book is CRAP, published to make money. Every one of my objections is in the blog.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=4356</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=4356</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 01:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
<category>The limitations of science</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hawking:  \&quot;The same old CRAP.\&quot;</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=cosmic-clowning-stephen-hawkings-ne-2010-09-13">http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=cosmic-clowning-stephen-hawkings-ne-...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=4353</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=4353</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
<category>The limitations of science</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
