<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Interesting News</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Interesting News (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;a href=http://xvinews.com&gt;Interesting News&lt;/a&gt;-They have developed a lots of opportunities to the newspapers to deliver breaking news more timely. In this way they might take on the broadcast journalism. Online newspapers are also cost effective than the printed-newspapers. Online newspapers follow the same legal regulations of the printed-newspapers. Online publications are recognized to reap larger rewards compared to printed publications. It can draw larger traffics when compared to printed publications.-Many news reporters are taught to shoot videos also to write news stories that may be published within the online publication also. In many journalism institutions students are now being taught concerning the online publications an internet-based newspapers combined with the printed newspapers. Some newspapers have previously integrated the world wide web into every single element of their operations. The classified advertisements are also being published in the printed newspapers as well as online newspapers. In the present scenario it would be difficult to get a newspaper company with out a website. Using the declining income from the printed newspapers they have got explored every corner to acquire higher income in the websites. Most of the online news-papers tend not to charge any subscription fee. Some of the news-papers have fallen with an all new version of newspapers that may be called E-paper. These E-papers are considered to be the digital replicas of the printed news-papers.-There are also some newspaper companies who provide only the online version in the news-paper. It doesn&amp;apos;t have any hitting the ground with the printed newspapers. These news-papers are recognized by many media groups making them not the same as blog sites. Some of the leading news-papers company which includes been operational in printed media for over 100 years have been stopped their printed newspapers and so are running on only online news-papers. There are newspapers companies who&amp;apos;ve only online news-papers but also provide limited publishing or hard copies. These news-papers are known as hybrid news-papers. Recent rise in electronic news-papers may force a few of the newspapers companies to supplement electronic papers too.-Today, additionally , you will find online news portals that performs exam news and short news about the most important happenings in the country or perhaps the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5660</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5660</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>TaiblyHal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here you go Larry:  <a href="http://www.agnosticsinternational.net/forum/index.php-at">http://www.agnosticsinternational.net/forum/index.php-at</a> least this link was working today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5626</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5626</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 07:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>The An-Jel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, I&amp;apos;ve emailed the organizers of Agnostics International, which has replaced Agnostic Forums, to find out what&amp;apos;s gone wrong. I hope they&amp;apos;ll restore the link soon, but in the meantime perhaps you might find some of our own discussions useful. You&amp;apos;d be very welcome to join in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5595</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5595</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>dhw</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started out on Agnostic forums as a means of support,after that as a means of education. Please advise  me of where my friends have gone ....larryfayles@gmail.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5594</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5594</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 05:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>waiting for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5527</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5527</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 07:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>C.E.O</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Neil takes care of the occasional spam. We have also been attacked on rare occasion by over zealous nuns, fundimentalists, etc., but that only makes the case for us that religions create more trouble than they are worth. However, reacting to religious foolishness is a poor reason to be an atheist or an agnostic.I am neither, but I have a faith of my own doing, based on a study of the science of cosmology &amp; particle physics and on the discovery that the Darwin theory is swiss-cheese, sort of a faith-based religion of its own. I do believe evolution occurred, but that DNA has guidance codes that create a drive toward complexity.That is a short summary of my previous posts.-On this particular statement I could not agree with you more. Even if we perhaps disagree on details, I think the &amp;apos;spirit&amp;apos; of our belief system is very similar.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5492</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5492</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>Balance_Maintained</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Back on AF we used to get hit by 3 or more spam bots every day:  one of the main duties of the mods was to track them down and kill them off early in their spamming activities.-Neil takes care of the occasional spam. We have also been attacked on rare occasion by over zealous nuns, fundimentalists, etc., but that only makes the case for us that religions create more trouble than they are worth. However, reacting to religious foolishness is a poor reason to be an atheist or an agnostic.I am neither, but I have a faith of my own doing, based on a study of the science of cosmology &amp; particle physics and on the discovery that the Darwin theory is swiss-cheese, sort of a faith-based religion of its own. I do believe evolution occurred, but that DNA has guidance codes that create a drive toward complexity.That is a short summary of my previous posts.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5491</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5491</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We don&amp;apos;t have a moderator here. We&amp;apos;ve never needed one. Those of us who  contribute regularly have been courteous to each other in our wide ranging discussions. There is no point into dividing into groups. We are not defending anything. Once we admit that no one knows the truth about a greater power, we can allow all sorts of  opinions and reasonings.-Back on AF we used to get hit by 3 or more spam bots every day:  one of the main duties of the mods was to track them down and kill them off early in their spamming activities.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5490</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5490</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>By &amp;quot;last word&amp;quot; I meant on this particular topic.&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; I do hope that I have some viewpoints that you would like to examine and discuss in other threads, and have relevant input into ideas offered by others.-I knew what you meant. It is just my thought that adding heads multiplies the depth of the discussions.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5489</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5489</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats how the forums were set up I thought initially and thats how I thought they should have continued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5488</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5488</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>The An-Jel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By &amp;quot;last word&amp;quot; I meant on this particular topic.-I do hope that I have some viewpoints that you would like to examine and discuss in other threads, and have relevant input into ideas offered by others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5487</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5487</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; I must apologise for your forum being used to air the dirty washing from one that no longer exists, and promise that this will be my last word on this topic around here.-As a regular member here, and in the absence of dhw, let me invite you to hang around and join in our discussions when you are inclined. We do not snap anyone&amp;apos;s head off. Disagree at times, yes, but in good debate fashion.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5486</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5486</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; I don&amp;apos;t think the idea of grouping Agnostics into different little groups is  any different than the myriad of tiny groups that the ReligionS (big S there)has divided themselves into trying to conquer one another and everyone else either.&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; I don&amp;apos;t know why the Forums were closed and its sad to see them go.-We don&amp;apos;t have a moderator here. We&amp;apos;ve never needed one. Those of us who  contribute regularly have been courteous to each other in our wide ranging discussions. There is no point into dividing into groups. We are not defending anything. Once we admit that no one knows the truth about a greater power, we can allow all sorts of  opinions and reasonings.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5485</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5485</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, it would seem that AF has lost ALL the posts made on it in the last 18 months or more, so what happened back there is now lost forever.   And there is no sign that the site will be resurrected.-I was directed by George (a co-owner) to cut down on the amount of stuff the trolls posted and the personal insults being slung between various factions.   If that came across as a control freak mission of my own making, it was not my intent and no one ever complained to my face.-C&amp;apos;est la vie, as they say on other forums.-I must apologise for your forum being used to air the dirty washing from one that no longer exists, and promise that this will be my last word on this topic around here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5484</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5484</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&amp;apos;t mind saying it here.-I simply thought that the latest moderator Bill that Frank promoted went a lot control freak with his power and over editted religious and non-religious posts alike.  The out right insults towards members said &amp;quot;in so many words&amp;quot; made me nauseous and offended... I do not get offended personally but I felt it for the number of people that I confirmed with the people that were attacked by it.  I wanted them to understand that Bill didn&amp;apos;t speak for everyone even as he added the &amp;quot;WE&amp;quot; to his posts when dealing with the people he wanted to dominate.-I don&amp;apos;t think the idea of grouping Agnostics into different little groups is  any different than the myriad of tiny groups that the ReligionS (big S there)has divided themselves into trying to conquer one another and everyone else either.-I don&amp;apos;t know why the Forums were closed and its sad to see them go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5483</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5483</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>The An-Jel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>rom,&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Hey I didnt like the direction AF was going.  I hope the next incarnation is actually vaid.&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Any site you might shift us too?-Hi The An-Jel&amp;#13;&amp;#10;Good to hear from you.-Just curious what were the concerns regarding the old AF site?&amp;#13;&amp;#10;PM me if you like.-When I&amp;apos;m bored I also play at:&amp;#13;&amp;#10;http://www.rationalskepticism.org/ which is the phoenix rising from the old RichardDawkins.net&amp;#13;&amp;#10;and at&amp;#13;&amp;#10;http://www.jcf.org - Joseph Campbell who Og was always going on about.-The two sites could not be more diffrent.-rom</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5437</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5437</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>romansh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rom,-Hey I didnt like the direction AF was going.  I hope the next incarnation is actually vaid.-Any site you might shift us too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5435</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5435</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>TheAn-Jel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline; we need dhw (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really have no idea how we can join forces, other than by promoting each other&amp;apos;s site.  And the more all agnostic forums take on the same attitude and promote the cross-pollination of ideas and initiatives, the stronger our collective presence will become.  At least, I would hope so.-To help move this idea along, I have put a section on <a href="http://www.agnosticsinternational.net">http://www.agnosticsinternational.net</a> for use by AgnosticWeb members to post anything they wish to our members.-Regards-Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5388</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5388</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline; we need dhw (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>dhw here, folks. I&amp;apos;ve joined in, and you don&amp;apos;t have to drag me! I appreciate the kind comments too. Do by all means let&amp;apos;s correspond privately, but if anyone has ideas or strong feelings on this subject, please feel free to say so on the forum. We have very strict security arrangements to protect everyone&amp;apos;s privacy, but perhaps if, say, Bill and Romansh could register, I can get your email addresses from Neil, our administrator (unless, of course, you&amp;apos;re happy to make them public). I&amp;apos;d better give advance notice that I shall be away 20 December ... 1 January, but we could certainly set the ball rolling before then.-Hi dhw&amp;#13;&amp;#10;I registered a while back and I noticed Bill has also. &amp;#13;&amp;#10;Maybe a telecon? I find these things go better by phone - intonations etc.-Plus if you go to my homepage - you can get my (disposable) email from there.-all the best-rom</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5386</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5386</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>romansh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnostic Forums has gone offline; we need dhw (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAVID: <em>I think cross-links would be wonderful. We have a small number of active registered members, and I think very thoughtful discussions, and we appreciate your kind comments. Perhaps a larger input would bring in more areas of consideration. Thanks for checking with us, Rom.</em>-BILL: <em>Sorry for the delay in getting back to you - a 2 day soccer tournament took all the time I had during waking hours. I think that some sort of joint initiative would be a wonderful idea. If you want to contact me off-line, we could discuss the various options available to us.</em>-DAVID: <em>I find that a very interesting idea, but this site is owned and paid for by dhw. We need to drag him in and perhaps Rom, to make a committee for decisions. dhw, please join the discussion.</em>-dhw here, folks. I&amp;apos;ve joined in, and you don&amp;apos;t have to drag me! I appreciate the kind comments too. Do by all means let&amp;apos;s correspond privately, but if anyone has ideas or strong feelings on this subject, please feel free to say so on the forum. We have very strict security arrangements to protect everyone&amp;apos;s privacy, but perhaps if, say, Bill and Romansh could register, I can get your email addresses from Neil, our administrator (unless, of course, you&amp;apos;re happy to make them public). I&amp;apos;d better give advance notice that I shall be away 20 December ... 1 January, but we could certainly set the ball rolling before then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5385</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5385</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>dhw</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
