<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - IBM Declares Victory Over Human Intelligence</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>IBM Declares Victory Over Human Intelligence (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><p>Matt has drawn our attention to a major advance in AI, under the heading above:&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &gt; Well, if computers can learn to use &amp;quot;actual common sense&amp;quot;, that will certainly give them victory over many of the humans I know. Keep us posted.&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Matt and I have battled over computers and AI. The following article by a philosopher of science fits my thoughts exactly. Watson will never know it won. Some common sense memory, yes, consciousness never!&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703407304576154313126987674.html?KEYWORDS=John+Searle-I">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703407304576154313126987674.html?KEYWORDS...</a> think you&amp;apos;ve missed some of my recent discussion about the topic.  I no longer view AI as a possibility based on the current architectural models that we currently use.  If we have any hope of modeling the mind, we at a minimum need to be able to truly mimic its structure.-A rule in computer design:  everything is faster in hardware.  If the hardware doesn&amp;apos;t match the problem domain, you&amp;apos;re lost.-Thank you HP and your <a href="http://www.hpl.hp.com/news/2008/apr-jun/memristor.html">memristors</a>.</p>
</blockquote></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6044</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6044</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 02:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Identity</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>IBM Declares Victory Over Human Intelligence (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Matt has drawn our attention to a major advance in AI, under the heading above:&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Well, if computers can learn to use &amp;quot;actual common sense&amp;quot;, that will certainly give them victory over many of the humans I know. Keep us posted.-Matt and I have battled over computers and AI. The following article by a philosopher of science fits my thoughts exactly. Watson will never know it won. Some common sense memory, yes, consciousness never!-http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703407304576154313126987674.html?KEYWORDS=John+Searle</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6043</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6043</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Identity</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>IBM Declares Victory Over Human Intelligence (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Matt has drawn our attention to a major advance in AI, under the heading above:&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9209661/IBM_s_Watson_s_ability_to_converse_is_a_...&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;">http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9209661/IBM_s_Watson_s_ability_to_converse_is_a_...</a> &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; The ability to converse is certainly a great advance for a computer, but &amp;quot;<strong>Victory Over Human Intelligence</strong>&amp;quot;? What age human?&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;  &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; However, here&amp;apos;s an interesting extract:&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;     &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; <em>Chu-Carroll said computers may be learning to use actual common sense over the next five to 10 years. </em>      &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;quot;<em>I would like to see computers be more able to understand the world much better,&amp;quot; she added. &amp;quot;We&amp;apos;re trying to code rules of common sense knowledge. Rain is wet. Dogs are animals. We&amp;apos;d like to address this in a more scalable way. Maybe computers could learn some of this from reading books and use them to augment their knowledge</em>.&amp;quot;&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Well, if computers can learn to use &amp;quot;actual common sense&amp;quot;, that will certainly give them victory over many of the humans I know. Keep us posted.-Yeah... I left the title provocative for a reason.  But your last line here is a howler!</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6022</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6022</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Identity</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>IBM Declares Victory Over Human Intelligence (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt has drawn our attention to a major advance in AI, under the heading above:-http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9209661/IBM_s_Watson_s_ability_to_converse_is_a_...-The ability to converse is certainly a great advance for a computer, but &amp;quot;<strong>Victory Over Human Intelligence</strong>&amp;quot;? What age human?&amp;#13;&amp;#10; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;However, here&amp;apos;s an interesting extract:&amp;#13;&amp;#10;    &amp;#13;&amp;#10;<em>Chu-Carroll said computers may be learning to use actual common sense over the next five to 10 years. </em>      &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&amp;quot;<em>I would like to see computers be more able to understand the world much better,&amp;quot; she added. &amp;quot;We&amp;apos;re trying to code rules of common sense knowledge. Rain is wet. Dogs are animals. We&amp;apos;d like to address this in a more scalable way. Maybe computers could learn some of this from reading books and use them to augment their knowledge</em>.&amp;quot;-Well, if computers can learn to use &amp;quot;actual common sense&amp;quot;, that will certainly give them victory over many of the humans I know. Keep us posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6003</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6003</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Identity</category><dc:creator>dhw</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>IBM Declares Victory Over Human Intelligence</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9209661/IBM_s_Watson_s_ability_to_converse_is_a_huge_advance_for_AI_research">http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9209661/IBM_s_Watson_s_ability_to_converse_is_a_...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5987</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5987</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Identity</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
