<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Sandwalk: chronologic review of DNA discovery</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Sandwalk: chronologic review of DNA discovery (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Moran of Sandwalk poo-poo&amp;apos;s Wells. Klinghoffer seems to cut him off at the knees. The Darwinists are in panic. The less &amp;apos;junk&amp;apos; DNA, the more a universal mind appears likely. And the progress in research equals much less &amp;apos;junk&amp;apos; DNA is found, more DNA is functional and very much more complex. Darwin is for the simple, not the complex. More complexity equals more odds against chance!-Moran on the attack!:-http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6449</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6449</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 13:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sandwalk: chronologic review of DNA discovery (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2008/02/theme-genomes-junk-dna.html&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;">http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2008/02/theme-genomes-junk-dna.html&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;</a> &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; An interesting <a href="presentahttp://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/05/junk_dna_and_the_darwinist_res046611.htmltion">presentahttp://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/05/junk_dna_and_the_darwinist_res046611.htmltion</a> to study-And an answer from David Klinghoffer reviewing Jonathan Wells new book: The Myth of Junk DNA.-http://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/05/junk_dna_and_the_darwinist_res046611.html-Moran of Sandwalk poo-poo&amp;apos;s Wells. Klinghoffer seems to cut him off at the knees. The Darwinists are in panic. The less &amp;apos;junk&amp;apos; DNA, the more a universal mind appears likely. And the progress in research equals much less &amp;apos;junk&amp;apos; DNA is found, more DNA is functional and very much more complex. Darwin is for the simple, not the complex. More complexity equals more odds against chance!</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6448</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6448</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 20:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sandwalk: chronologic review of DNA discovery</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2008/02/theme-genomes-junk-dna.html-An">http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2008/02/theme-genomes-junk-dna.html-An</a> interesting presentation to study</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6413</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6413</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 14:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
