<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Dawkins, a coward?</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Dawkins, a coward? (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html-He">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-f...</a> could just be bored by bringing up the same arguments again... and again... and again... and...</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6468</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6468</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 23:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dawkins, a coward? (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You only have to look back at the lectures Dawkins has given at venues deep in the US Bible Belt, and the way he fielded all the hostile questioning. I would much prefer to see Richard Dawkins debating with some of his Humanist critics.-George, can you please explain your last comment. What are the criticisms of Dawkins that come from Humanists?</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6445</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6445</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 13:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dawkins, a coward? (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&amp;apos;t understand why the BHA among others should be seeking to put on these types of useless confrontations between Theologians and Humanists. There have been so many of them, and they never get anywhere. Theology is a totally vacuous activity and a waste of time. I&amp;apos;m sure Richard Dawkins has far better things to do than give nonentities like Lane Craig publicity. As for accusations of cowardice, this is too ridiculous a claim to give any notice to. You only have to look back at the lectures Dawkins has given at venues deep in the US Bible Belt, and the way he fielded all the hostile questioning. I would much prefer to see Richard Dawkins debating with some of his Humanist critics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6444</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6444</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 11:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>George Jelliss</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dawkins, a coward?</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-f...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6443</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6443</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 04:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
