And I mean that literally. We now have the ability to write programs with DNA.
> > > 
> > > http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2011/05/16/nyu-researchers-outline-meth... > 
> > DNA is amazing stuff. It is a digital code, differing from 0&1 codes. But how much is 'junk' and what does that prove. Moran is debating the validity of the statements in Jonathan Wells' book, The Myth of Junk DNA.
> > 
> > http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/ today
> 
> Clearly wasn't meant for me... "Junk" DNA I learned was a source of cell development and mediation functions. It was only junk from the perspective of the Central Dogma.-And here is a refutation of Moran:-http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2011/05/education-of-science-writer.html

And I mean that literally. We now have the ability to write programs with DNA.
> > 
> > http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2011/05/16/nyu-researchers-outline-meth... 
> DNA is amazing stuff. It is a digital code, differing from 0&1 codes. But how much is 'junk' and what does that prove. Moran is debating the validity of the statements in Jonathan Wells' book, The Myth of Junk DNA.
> 
> http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/ today-Clearly wasn't meant for me... "Junk" DNA I learned was a source of cell development and mediation functions. It was only junk from the perspective of the Central Dogma.

And I mean that literally. We now have the ability to write programs with DNA.
> 
> http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2011/05/16/nyu-researchers-outline-meth... is amazing stuff. It is a digital code, differing from 0&1 codes. But how much is 'junk' and what does that prove. Moran is debating the validity of the statements in Jonathan Wells' book, The Myth of Junk DNA.-http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/ today