<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - EU Cosmology; Spin universe</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>EU Cosmology; Spin universe (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I raise this flag again, despite David&amp;apos;s previous refusal to acknowledge any merit in it, because of recent discoveries in cosmology as well as bio-medical research.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/Cosmology/index.html">http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/Cosmology/index.html</a></p>
<p>I know that many modern cosmologists are hesitant to give up their pet theories, but they shouldn&amp;apos;t exclude others from trying to prove/disprove the theories.</p>
</blockquote><p>Latest tentative finding. The early universe might have had spin that may well be continuing. We can&amp;apos;t &amp;apos;see&amp;apos; the spin, but there are telltale signs of it in the CMB, and the galaxies spin both right and left in a pattern that suggests spin. Note that I am always interested in new findings that have merit in my eyes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228342.300-original-spin-was-the-universe-born-whirling.html?page=1">http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228342.300-original-spin-was-the-universe-born-...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=7442</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=7442</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Origins</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>EU Cosmology (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Ned Wright&amp;apos;s criticism of Lerner:-http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/lerner_errors.html-Alternative theories are given consideration.&amp;#13;&amp;#10;They just don&amp;apos;t stand up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6714</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6714</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Origins</category><dc:creator>George Jelliss</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>EU Cosmology</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I raise this flag again, despite David&amp;apos;s previous refusal to acknowledge any merit in it, because of recent discoveries in cosmology as well as bio-medical research.-http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/Cosmology/index.html-I know that many modern cosmologists are hesitant to give up their pet theories, but they shouldn&amp;apos;t exclude others from trying to prove/disprove the theories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6701</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=6701</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Origins</category><dc:creator>Balance_Maintained</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
