<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Consciousness explored; book review also</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Consciousness explored; book review also (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&amp;apos;ve only had time to read the first article, but wow... what an interesting read.  -From a scientific perspective, I recall that individuals that had the greatest problem-solving ability had especially active corpus collosums.  (Bridge between the two hemispheres for the anatomically challenged...)-As I&amp;apos;ve been meditating alot more the past few weeks, as well as upping my &amp;quot;dose&amp;quot; of associated writings... you begin to notice exactly when you&amp;apos;re using one kind of process as opposed to the other.  -Both Buddhism and Hinduism seem focused on developing that &amp;quot;System 1&amp;quot; as it were...  -And I fully agree with that focus.  My readings of Catholic mystics also support the notion that mystics of all kinds have a similar focus.  The article&amp;apos;s reference to the Zohar especially...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=8873</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=8873</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Consciousness explored; book review also (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Two styles of thought, System 1 and System 2. Reasonable&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; <a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2012/01/17/the-creativity-of-dual-process-system-1-thinking/?WT_mc_id=SA_DD_20120118&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;">http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2012/01/17/the-creativity-of-dual-proces...</a> &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;   Raymond Tellis reviews, The Character of Consciousness:&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; <a href="http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/what-consciousness-is-not-Review">http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/what-consciousness-is-not-Review</a> of Tellis&amp;apos; book, <em>Aping Mankind</em> which appears to debunk the free will deniers. i have a copy and will read shortly.-http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204542404577158743023989640.html?KEYWORDS=Gerald+Russello</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=8838</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=8838</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Consciousness explored; book review also</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two styles of thought, System 1 and System 2. Reasonable</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2012/01/17/the-creativity-of-dual-process-system-1-thinking/?WT_mc_id=SA_DD_20120118">http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2012/01/17/the-creativity-of-dual-proces...</a></p>
<p>  Raymond Tellis reviews, The Character of Consciousness:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/what-consciousness-is-not">http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/what-consciousness-is-not</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=8798</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=8798</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Introduction</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
