<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Random events + selection beats human tuners...</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Random events + selection beats human tuners... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27673/&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;">http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27673/&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;</a> &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; MATT: <em>A potshot @ David of course! <img src="images/smilies/wink.png" alt=";-)" /></em>&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Ugh, ugh, these headline writers!&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; Quote: &amp;quot;Haye Hinrichsen proposes a solution [...] that <strong>may make it possible for electronic tuners to match</strong> the performance of the best human tuners.&amp;quot;&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; And Hinrichsen&amp;apos;s algorithm, as compared to professional tuners, &amp;quot;doesn&amp;apos;t come off badly at all.&amp;quot;&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; If that = BEATS human tuners, we are dancing to a different beat!-I read the paper.  The theory is rock-solid, all that&amp;apos;s needed now is to tweak that algorithm.  -It&amp;apos;s done, son.  <img src="images/smilies/wink.png" alt=";-)" /></p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=9325</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=9325</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Humans</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Random events + selection beats human tuners... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27673/-MATT:">http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27673/-MATT:</a> <em>A potshot @ David of course! <img src="images/smilies/wink.png" alt=";-)" /></em>-Ugh, ugh, these headline writers!-Quote: &amp;quot;Haye Hinrichsen proposes a solution [...] that <strong>may make it possible for electronic tuners to match</strong> the performance of the best human tuners.&amp;quot;-And Hinrichsen&amp;apos;s algorithm, as compared to professional tuners, &amp;quot;doesn&amp;apos;t come off badly at all.&amp;quot;-If that = BEATS human tuners, we are dancing to a different beat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=9323</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=9323</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Humans</category><dc:creator>dhw</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Random events + selection beats human tuners... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27673/&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;">http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27673/&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;</a> &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; A potshot @ David of course! <img src="images/smilies/wink.png" alt=";-)" />-It took years to equal nature, if this new method really does. Nature&amp;apos;s nanomachines are better than human designs every time.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=9321</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=9321</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Humans</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Random events + selection beats human tuners...</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27673/-A">http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27673/-A</a> potshot @ David of course! <img src="images/smilies/wink.png" alt=";-)" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=9318</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=9318</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Humans</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
