Falsifiability (Introduction)

by romansh , Sunday, June 21, 2015, 23:55 (3233 days ago) @ David Turell


> > > > Romansh: I would argue a loving God in any common use of the word loving is falsifiable.
> > > 
> > > David: Your basis? Religious statements, religious wars?
> > 
> > Romansh: disease
> > tsunamis
> > earthquakes
> > starvation
> > 
> > these are not the hallmarks of a loving god certainly not an omnipotent conscious one. If you disagree I would love to hear your reasoning.
> 
> You are using the religious approach to God assuming their attributes of Him are true. I don't know that. I can only conclude that God is the greater power behind creation. He may well be conscious and omnipotent, but there is nothing in nature that tells me He is consciously loving, as your list points out. But that does not falsify the need for a first cause. I can only hope He is loving.-Exactly ... we can at least falsify to some degree a loving God. I am not making any claims about any other god religious or otherwise.-First cause? The instability of nothing?