Agnosticism and other related labels (Agnosticism)

by romansh , Sunday, May 11, 2014, 22:51 (3636 days ago) @ David Turell

Romansh: If you think understanding the meaning (and nature) of words don't help or matter, fair enough.
> 
> You have been defining terms covering folks intent in thinking about God or no God or gods. Words in the discussions should be defined so we all understand each other, 
Agreed.
> but, as an example, Dawkins degree of atheism is of very little importance to the overall discussion and content of the conversation. 
Agreed, generally I have avoided that part of the discussion. I don't how I could neasure how certain I am in a certain type of god? 
> I don't care what degree of atheist he is. It doesn't redefine the content of his writings.
Agreed, it is our interpretation of the content that defines the content,