Agnosticism and other related labels (Agnosticism)

by David Turell , Monday, May 12, 2014, 01:13 (3631 days ago) @ romansh

David: Dawkins degree of atheism is of very little importance to the overall discussion and content of the conversation. 
> Romansh: Agreed, generally I have avoided that part of the discussion. I don't how I could neasure how certain I am in a certain type of god? 
> > David: I don't care what degree of atheist he is. It doesn't redefine the content of his writings.
> Romansh: Agreed, it is our interpretation of the content that defines the content,-My role on this website has not been to define God. I can't measure types of God. I can't describe God. What I have done is to describe the complexities of the cosmology of this universe, as I understand them; the complexities of the biochemistry of life and of evolution; the difficulties in understanding the origin of life. And from all of this, perhaps as an approach from incredulity, concluding and stating that chance cannot have caused the reality we experience. There must be a guiding greater power, which I cannot be expected to describe beyond that simple statement. Does this power have more than an enermous intellect? I don't know. Adler's considered position was that there is a 50/50 chance He cares about us.