causation (Introduction)

by GateKeeper , Friday, May 30, 2014, 12:16 (3619 days ago) @ romansh
edited by unknown, Friday, May 30, 2014, 12:42

All of them are are more "real" than "fake" rom. -"truth", you say that like it as an "absolute value". We don't know enough yet to state it like this. What we do have is the "best truth" we can have today. So would we follow "no truth" or "the best we have"?-also, science is not a "thing". It is a process. So you are kind of right. But science does not accept anything. "science" is the process of "data collection". Then "scientist" come in. Science and scientist is like accounting and accountant.-I make this distinction because I feel people that are not "science" minded shy away from "SIENCE!!!!! says" because they don't feel they are up to it. I always tell them 'are you afraid of accounting?" Would you? could you? question an accountant? They answer "yes". Then I ask them what color is that wall? They tell me a "color" and I say there you just "did science". But then I tell them there is no color white. That is when the party starts.