causation (Introduction)

by GateKeeper @, Sunday, June 08, 2014, 18:46 (3610 days ago) @ romansh

what is more reasonable?
> > > > "chance" as defined, or "caused" as defined? 
> > > > It really is that simple.
> > > I don't really see them as separate. So the question of which is more reasonable? is superflous ... at least for me.
> > Could you explain why that answer(s) is "excessive" "needless" for me?
> There are two ways of interpreting your question GK
> 
> 1) For you personally why is the question superflous ... You have to decide whether the question is needed for yourself.
> 
> 2) If indeed chance and cause are the same thing (chaos theory) or quantum phenomena, then there is no need to have one being more reasonable than the other.
> 
> At least it seems that way to me.-gotcha. I have no reason. Really all I have is a line of questioning that holds up under most conditions.-quantum soup is something. 
"chance" as a cause. With random as "hard to predict" within a given set of "restraints".-a reasonable conclusion, but not only one: a living universe. 
As defined by reasonable uses of the words involved.-there ya have it again. What is nice for me is that I do not believe in this "monism religion", yet it still leads to the same conclusion as mine. There will be the 10% to 20% unreasonable. But all within those limits should be proven "not reasonable". This monism is great stuff when needed.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum