causation (Introduction)

by David Turell , Sunday, June 01, 2014, 16:14 (3617 days ago) @ romansh


> Rom: I did not ask whether you had absolute proof of god. Do you have proof of god?
> And if so how is this proof different from evidence for god?-I said I didn't have absolute proof. I said it added up to proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
> 
> Rom: Adler's proof - what are his axioms? Are they reasonable? What are the weaknesses of his arguments?-Read his book, How to Think About God, 1980 and judge for yourself
> 
> Rom; So your proof is entirely personal?-Yes
> 
> Rom:Anyway ... your use of proof is remains equivalent of evidence.-Just what i said
> 
> Rom:And any proof that has an argument form incredulity in it is not a proof in my book.-I don't expect you to accept it. I am using the best evidence, as done by many other authors to explain why we exist. I cannot accept chance,can you?