Innovation (Introduction)

by David Turell @, Wednesday, May 08, 2013, 01:37 (4017 days ago) @ BBella


> bbella: But, if we accept the quantum connection and/or Sheldrake's morphic field, don't we then have the connection which creates similarity in organisms?-dhw is suggesting organisms which run their own evolutionary affairs. To me the various animals and plants are interconnected in their phenotypes (body plans). We all look alike, have five fingers, etc. I think it is a quantum interconnection, but while individual sister particles are connected and know what each other is doing, if there is central planning and design, as I envision, the connection may be more unidirectional from a central planning mind.
> 
> bbella: For me, the real question isn't whether there is one single creator "entity" or many, within or without. All creation could be (and most likely is) connected at a single quantum level regardless of either. The real question then becomes, for me: Is this single vibratory level self aware in the sense of a human self awareness, or is it self aware on a deeper level in the sense that every movement affects all that is on that vibratory level.-We are discussing something that is very nebulous. All we can know is the 'mind', ours, that we experience and recognized in others. Your quantum vibratory level must act mind-like with its self-awareness. That makes it like my concept of universal conscousness. We are not very far apart. Our consciousness is a form of emergent energy and it must be at a quantum level. And finally, since everything in the universe is really energy, at the quantum level it is all connected. But I really don't think amoebas are trying to connect with me, but they do connect with each other and create a simple multicellular stalk-like form.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum